Procedures
Implant Types
Shape & Profile
Surface & Brand
Placement
Safety
Patient Info
Blog Free Consultation
Implant Surface · 3 of 4

Macrotextured surface implants

Coarse-pore surface texture — dominant for anatomical implants 2000-2018, largely withdrawn after 2019 Allergan BIOCELL recall due to elevated BIA-ALCL risk. Modern reference for patients with existing BIOCELL implants.

Clinical summary

Macrotextured implants — particularly Allergan BIOCELL pattern — were the dominant texture for anatomical implants from 2000-2018. The 2019 worldwide recall of BIOCELL macrotextured implants by Allergan, following BIA-ALCL incidence data showing approximately 1 in 2,000-3,000 lifetime risk, fundamentally reshaped the implant surface landscape. Modern practice uses microtextured for anatomical and smooth for round; macrotextured is largely withdrawn. Patients with existing BIOCELL implants do not require automatic explant but should monitor for symptoms.

The four surface categories

SurfaceTexture scaleBIA-ALCL risk profileBest for
SmoothPolished/glossyEssentially undetectableRound implants where rotation doesn't matter
MicrotexturedFine surface roughness (~50-100 µm)Lower than macrotexturedAnatomical implants; modern standard
MacrotexturedCoarser pores (~200-700 µm)Higher (BIOCELL-pattern recalled 2019)Largely withdrawn from market
Polyurethane-coatedFoam-like coatingVery lowSpecialty — strong tissue adherence, low rotation

The surface decision is one of the most clinically meaningful in implant selection. Surface affects rotation risk (anatomical implants need texture; round don't), capsular contracture rates (debated but historically textured had lower rates), and BIA-ALCL risk (specifically associated with macrotextured surfaces).

What macrotextured was

Macrotextured surfaces had pore sizes of approximately 200-700 microns — visible as deliberate textured surface, often described as "salt-and-pepper" or "rough." Major macrotextured products historically:

The 2019 BIOCELL recall

Timeline of events leading to the recall:

The recall affected hundreds of thousands of patients globally. The FDA estimated BIA-ALCL lifetime risk with BIOCELL implants at approximately 1 in 2,000-3,000 (some studies suggest higher in specific populations). For comparison: smooth implants have essentially undetectable BIA-ALCL risk; microtextured implants approximately 1 in 30,000-100,000.

BIA-ALCL understanding

BIA-ALCL (breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma) is a rare cancer of the immune system that develops in the capsule (scar tissue) around a breast implant. Key facts:

See dedicated BIA-ALCL page for current evidence overview, symptoms, and management.

What patients with BIOCELL implants should do

ActionRecommendation
Automatic explantNOT recommended for asymptomatic patients
Confirm your implant typeYes — check operative records or consult surgeon
Monitor for symptomsYes — new asymmetry, swelling, palpable masses, fluid collection
Routine MRI surveillanceYes — for silent silicone gel rupture, every 2-3 years
Imaging if symptoms developYes — ultrasound or MRI immediately
Consult surgeon if concernsYes — early evaluation reassures and identifies issues early
Elective explant for anxietyDiscuss with surgeon — patient choice supported

Modern replacement options

For patients undergoing implant exchange (whether for BIOCELL concern or other reasons), modern replacement surfaces:

The shift in modern practice toward smooth and microtextured surfaces reflects the post-2019 risk-benefit reassessment. Modern implant exchange is a well-established procedure — see implant exchange page for details.

Frequently asked questions

Why were Allergan BIOCELL macrotextured implants recalled?
In July 2019, Allergan voluntarily recalled BIOCELL macrotextured breast implants and tissue expanders worldwide following FDA, ANSM (France), MHRA (UK), and other regulator concerns about elevated BIA-ALCL (breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma) risk. BIA-ALCL incidence with BIOCELL macrotextured implants was estimated at approximately 1 in 2,000-3,000 lifetime — substantially higher than other implant surfaces. The recall removed BIOCELL macrotextured implants from the global market. Patients with these implants do not require automatic explant but are advised to monitor for symptoms and consult their surgeon.
Are any macrotextured implants still available?
Some non-BIOCELL macrotextured surfaces remain available in specific markets, but the category has substantially contracted since 2019. Polytech polyurethane-coated implants (sometimes categorised as a separate macrotextured-related category) remain widely available in Europe. Some other macrotextured variants (Mentor Siltex was already in the lower-risk microtextured category) continue but with restricted use. The 2019 recall fundamentally shifted the market toward microtextured and smooth surfaces.
What should I do if I have BIOCELL macrotextured implants?
FDA, ANSM, MHRA, and other regulators do not recommend automatic explant for asymptomatic patients with BIOCELL implants. Recommended actions: (1) confirm your implant brand and texture by consulting your operative records or your surgeon; (2) monitor for new breast asymmetry, swelling, palpable masses, or fluid collection; (3) consult your surgeon if any concerning symptoms develop; (4) understand that BIA-ALCL is treatable when diagnosed early — typically curative with capsulectomy and implant removal. Patients with concerning symptoms or anxiety can discuss explant with their surgeon.
Can I have BIA-ALCL with non-Allergan macrotextured implants?
BIA-ALCL has been reported with multiple macrotextured implant brands (Allergan BIOCELL had highest documented incidence; other macrotextured surfaces had lower but not zero risk). The 2019 recall focused on BIOCELL specifically, but the broader category of macrotextured surfaces is associated with elevated BIA-ALCL risk compared to smooth or microtextured. Patients with any macrotextured implant should monitor for symptoms similarly.
Why was macrotexturing thought to be beneficial historically?
Macrotextured surfaces were developed in the 1990s-2000s with two primary goals: (1) lower capsular contracture rates by allowing tissue ingrowth into the larger pores, and (2) anchor anatomical implants in correct orientation through tissue adherence. These benefits were real — macrotextured implants did show lower contracture rates than smooth in clinical studies, and provided rotation immunity for anatomical shapes. The benefits were substantial enough that macrotextured was the dominant surface for anatomical implants from approximately 2000-2018. The unforeseen BIA-ALCL risk emerged in long-term follow-up.
Will my replacement implants need to be macrotextured?
No — replacement implants from any patient with explanted macrotextured implants would be smooth or microtextured in modern practice. The 2019 recall and subsequent shift have made macrotextured replacement uncommon. Modern surgeons select smooth round (most common) or microtextured anatomical (when anatomical shape is required) for replacement. For specific cases requiring polyurethane-coated implants (some revision indications), Polytech polyurethane-coated remains available in European markets.

Related references

Photographic assessment by Dr. Erdal

Send 5-angle photographs via WhatsApp. Personal assessment with profile and size recommendation within 24 hours.

WhatsApp +90 544 850 72 32 →